The 50 Most Technologically Advanced Cities in America – Detroit Places 31st
Photo by cottonbro studio
Article courtesy of Click Insights
- Detroit, Michigan, ranks 31st, with an overall score of 48.2
- The city has a 55% average graduation rate at computer institutes and 1,955 tech jobs
- The study measured factors including WiFi hotspots, graduation rates for computer studies, the number of institutes offering tech and computing programs, tech job availability and high-rated tech companies in the area
A new study has revealed the most technologically advanced cities in America, with Detroit, Michigan, taking the 31st spot.
The study by SEO software company Click Insights analyzed cities in America with a population count of over 300,000 across the following metrics:
1. Number of institutes offering computer programs
2. Average graduation rate for tech courses
3. Number of WiFi hotspots in the city
4. Total number of tech jobs available in the city
5. Total number of tech companies that are rated three stars or higher on Glassdoor
These factors were then weighted and put into an index to establish which cities in America are really the most technologically advanced.
Michigan’s Findings
Detroit, Michigan, is the 31st-most technologically advanced city in the country.
Detroit has 4 institutes offering computer programs, an average tech graduation rate of 55%, 567 WiFi hotspots, 1,955 tech jobs, and 935 tech companies rated three stars or higher on Glassdoor.
Top 5 Technologically Advanced Cities in America
1. Washington, District of Columbia
Washington, DC, ranks as the nation’s most technologically advanced city. This is due to the city ranking highly in every factor assessed. Notably, Washington, DC, has the highest number of tech jobs available in the city at 17.350 according to Glassdoor. The city also ranks second among all states for the number of institutes offering computer programs, at 10 (which is tied with Los Angeles). When it comes to highly rated tech companies in the area, Washington, DC, ranks fourth overall with 2,924 companies that are tech-based in the area receiving three or more stars on Glassdoor. The factor that Washington ranks lowest at is the graduation rate for tech courses at 65%, which is above average, however, 17th overall.
2. St. Paul, Minnesota
St.Paul in Minnesota ranks as the second most technologically advanced city in the United States. Despite not being the top-ranking city in any metric, its highest placement for a factor studied is for the graduation rate of tech courses, where it’s the fifth-highest rate in the country at 62%. It also ranks within the top 15 cities for the number of institutes in the city offering computing courses at the twelfth highest rate (7 institutes).
3. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
The third most technologically advanced city in America is Pittsburgh in Pennsylvania. Pittsburgh’s best performing category was the graduation rate of tech courses, with 64% – the third highest rate in the country. However, where Pittsburgh falls short and prevents it from being higher on the list is due to the availability of tech jobs, where there are only 1,565 in the city being advertised, which ranks 33rd out of all cities assessed.
4. Miami, Florida
Miami is the first of three Floridian cities on the top 50 list, ranking as the fourth most technologically advanced city in America. There are 3,895 WiFi hotspots across the city, the fourth highest number of any city analyzed. There are also 1,167 tech companies in Miami that are ranked three stars or higher on Glassdoor which is the 20th best rate of any city assessed. Its lowest position for a factor is 30th which is for the availability of tech jobs in the city, which are 2,108.
5. Irvine, California
Irvine is the most technologically advanced city in California and fifth in the country. Irvine has the best graduation rate in the country, with 67% overall, giving Irvine its high rating in the final study. The city also ranks seventh for highly rated tech companies, with 2,211 companies in Irvine securing a three-star or higher rating from employees on Glassdoor. There are also 2,369 jobs available in the tech sector across Irvine, the 23rd highest rate of any city and above the national average.
Speaking on the findings, James Owen, Co-Founder of Click Insights, commented,
“This ranking highlights more than just graduation factors and WiFi hotspots, it indicates where the next Silicon Valley may be. It’s worth assessing these findings and considering that these locations may just be where investors are going to put their money next.
With various policy changes happening from the current administration, it’s worth keeping an eye on how this affects businesses, as some may relocate because of costs of labor and tax implications for corporations and it would be wise for business owners to consider the cities that appear at the top of this ranking.”
50 Most Technologically Advanced Cities in America
|
Rank
|
City Name
|
State
|
Number of Institutes Offering Computer Programs
|
Average Graduation Rate at Computer Institutes
|
Number of WiFi Hotspots
|
Total Number of Tech Jobs (Glassdoor)
|
Number of Information Tech Companies Above 3 Stars (Glassdoor)
|
Overall Index Score (/100)
|
|
1
|
Washington
|
District of Columbia
|
10
|
65%
|
1,237
|
17,350
|
2,924
|
78
|
|
2
|
St. Paul
|
Minnesota
|
7
|
62%
|
395
|
2,159
|
998
|
76
|
|
3
|
Pittsburgh
|
Pennsylvania
|
7
|
64%
|
405
|
1,565
|
665
|
73.8
|
|
4
|
Miami
|
Florida
|
6
|
61%
|
3,895
|
2,108
|
1,167
|
73.1
|
|
5
|
Irvine
|
California
|
5
|
67%
|
300
|
2,369
|
2,211
|
73
|
|
6
|
Atlanta
|
Georgia
|
9
|
56%
|
1,020
|
5,646
|
1,853
|
72.8
|
|
7
|
Newark
|
New Jersey
|
3
|
54%
|
614
|
4,466
|
4,278
|
71.6
|
|
8
|
Boston
|
Massachusetts
|
12
|
56%
|
1,035
|
4,846
|
1,518
|
68.5
|
|
9
|
Baltimore
|
Maryland
|
11
|
55%
|
468
|
6,455
|
1,118
|
67.1
|
|
10
|
Cincinnati
|
Ohio
|
4
|
55%
|
909
|
1,450
|
548
|
62.7
|
|
11
|
Minneapolis
|
Minnesota
|
7
|
52%
|
544
|
2,160
|
998
|
62.6
|
|
12
|
Arlington
|
Texas
|
1
|
57%
|
859
|
6,001
|
2,285
|
62.6
|
|
13
|
Orlando
|
Florida
|
5
|
42%
|
1,209
|
1,213
|
578
|
60.6
|
|
14
|
Anaheim
|
California
|
3
|
53%
|
207
|
2,723
|
2,211
|
58.4
|
|
15
|
San Francisco
|
California
|
6
|
52%
|
1,661
|
5,890
|
1,906
|
57.9
|
|
16
|
Seattle
|
Washington
|
7
|
46%
|
1,345
|
8,937
|
1,271
|
57.3
|
|
17
|
Long Beach
|
California
|
2
|
49%
|
4,900
|
2,211
|
—
|
57.1
|
|
18
|
Dallas
|
Texas
|
8
|
61%
|
1,920
|
7,142
|
2,285
|
56.3
|
|
19
|
Portland
|
Oregon
|
6
|
63%
|
1,618
|
1,137
|
618
|
56.3
|
|
20
|
Tampa
|
Florida
|
4
|
44%
|
913
|
2,191
|
900
|
55.8
|
|
21
|
Riverside
|
California
|
5
|
59%
|
450
|
436
|
265
|
55.4
|
|
22
|
Raleigh
|
North Carolina
|
6
|
51%
|
340
|
2,214
|
906
|
53.9
|
|
23
|
Oakland
|
California
|
3
|
29%
|
743
|
6,975
|
1,906
|
52.7
|
|
24
|
Cleveland
|
Ohio
|
3
|
55%
|
591
|
981
|
466
|
52
|
|
25
|
Kansas City
|
Missouri
|
5
|
51%
|
959
|
1,352
|
562
|
51.9
|
|
26
|
Denver
|
Colorado
|
5
|
46%
|
1,185
|
3,658
|
1,062
|
50.5
|
|
27
|
San Jose
|
California
|
4
|
44%
|
1,278
|
10,974
|
1,441
|
49.1
|
|
28
|
New Orleans
|
Louisiana
|
7
|
48%
|
337
|
349
|
188
|
48.8
|
|
29
|
Austin
|
Texas
|
5
|
49%
|
1,664
|
4,319
|
1,181
|
48.6
|
|
30
|
Milwaukee
|
Wisconsin
|
5
|
58%
|
675
|
874
|
478
|
48.6
|
|
31
|
Detroit
|
Michigan
|
4
|
55%
|
567
|
1,955
|
935
|
48.2
|
|
32
|
Columbus
|
Ohio
|
7
|
54%
|
1,175
|
2,072
|
831
|
47.6
|
|
33
|
Santa Ana
|
California
|
1
|
32%
|
339
|
2,420
|
2,211
|
47.3
|
|
34
|
Sacramento
|
California
|
6
|
52%
|
460
|
819
|
479
|
47.1
|
|
35
|
Aurora
|
Colorado
|
2
|
29%
|
591
|
3,471
|
1,062
|
45.8
|
|
36
|
Greensboro
|
North Carolina
|
4
|
46%
|
469
|
288
|
170
|
45
|
|
37
|
Fort Worth
|
Texas
|
3
|
48%
|
1,063
|
2,791
|
2,285
|
44.9
|
|
38
|
Los Angeles
|
California
|
10
|
60%
|
10,496
|
3,821
|
2,211
|
44.3
|
|
39
|
San Diego
|
California
|
12
|
49%
|
1,677
|
2,474
|
885
|
43.8
|
|
40
|
Colorado Springs
|
Colorado
|
5
|
43%
|
630
|
803
|
284
|
42.6
|
|
41
|
Virginia Beach
|
Virginia
|
5
|
38%
|
382
|
685
|
501
|
41.4
|
|
42
|
Omaha
|
Nebraska
|
3
|
51%
|
736
|
518
|
283
|
41.2
|
|
43
|
New York
|
New York
|
18
|
60%
|
12,038
|
8,343
|
4,278
|
40.3
|
|
44
|
Tulsa
|
Oklahoma
|
3
|
51%
|
626
|
353
|
172
|
40.1
|
|
45
|
Chicago
|
Illinois
|
21
|
42%
|
2,574
|
4,070
|
2,147
|
39.6
|
|
46
|
Memphis
|
Tennessee
|
6
|
46%
|
863
|
382
|
294
|
39.2
|
|
47
|
Henderson
|
Nevada
|
2
|
31%
|
672
|
628
|
402
|
39
|
|
48
|
San Antonio
|
Texas
|
12
|
49%
|
1,812
|
1,403
|
626
|
39
|
|
49
|
Philadelphia
|
Pennsylvania
|
11
|
60%
|
216
|
2,754
|
1,440
|
38.7
|
|
50
|
Charlotte
|
North Carolina
|
3
|
43%
|
915
|
2,335
|
874
|
38.3
|
Sources
nces.ed.gov, wifimap.io, glassdoor.com
Methodology
A total of 5 factors were used to compile the index. The raw data for each factor was cleaned, checked, and standardised on the same scale from 0 to 10, where 0 and 10 represent the worst and best values present in the data, to allow for accurate comparison between factors. Factors for which a high score would be negative were subtracted from 10 to invert their scoring.
A weighting was then assigned to each factor reflecting its importance within the analysis.
Once the weightings were assigned, the total score for the factors was calculated, producing an overall index score out of 100 for each entry, upon which the final ranking is based.
Discover more from Michigan Mama News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
